The French Revolution was not merely a political revolt. It was a deliberate assault on the Catholic order that had formed France for a thousand years. The ideals of popular sovereignty, the supremacy of reason, and absolute equality were aimed squarely at the Church. The Civil Constitution of the Clergy in 1790 forced priests to swear loyalty to the revolutionary state over Rome. Those who refused (the refractory priests) were hunted. Church property was seized. The Cult of Reason and later the Cult of the Supreme Being tried to replace the Mass. The monarchy fell with it. Louis XVI was dethroned after the Flight to Varennes and the storming of the Tuileries. He was tried as a traitor to the nation and executed on January 21, 1793. The revolutionaries treated the king’s head as the final obstacle to their new order. They were not wrong about that.
What followed was not stability. From the Terror and the Directory through Napoleon, the Bourbon Restoration, the July Monarchy, the Second Republic, the Second Empire, the Third Republic, Vichy, the Fourth Republic, and the Fifth, France has changed regimes more often than most nations change governments. Each new settlement promised to end the cycle. None has. The Fifth Republic’s strong presidency was meant to fix the paralysis of earlier systems. Instead it has produced personalized power, hung parliaments, fiscal strain, and recurring street unrest. The current migrant crisis and the parallel societies that have grown in the banlieues are not separate from this history. They are its latest fruit. When a nation rejects the religious and cultural framework that once ordered it, something else fills the vacuum.
The Revolution’s ideals undermined Catholicism by subordinating the Church to the state and by treating the Faith as one private opinion among others. Laïcité later codified that hostility. Without a strong Church as a source of moral formation, intermediate institutions, and shared identity, the French state has been left to manage society by decree and police power. That arrangement is brittle. Demographic change has made it more so. Islam has grown in France through decades of large-scale migration from North Africa and the Middle East, higher fertility rates among Muslim populations, and incomplete assimilation. Estimates put the Muslim share of the adult population near 7 percent today, with projections from Pew and others ranging from roughly 12 to 18 percent by mid-century under different migration scenarios. Parallel social structures, higher rates of radicalization in prisons and among some youth networks, and periodic terror incidents have followed. At the same time, a smaller but real movement of young French people is returning to Catholicism. Recent figures show adult baptisms rising sharply (over 13,000 in one recent year), with the 18–25 cohort prominent and many of the new converts drawn to more traditional and orthodox practice. Chartres pilgrimages and similar events now draw large numbers of young people. The trend is encouraging, but it remains a minority counter-current against the larger demographic shift.
A small but persistent monarchist current has never entirely disappeared. Action Française and various Legitimist and Orléanist groups continue to exist. Pretenders such as Jean d’Orléans and Louis Alphonse de Bourbon have spoken publicly about the Fifth Republic’s fragility. Support for actual restoration remains limited (older polls showed roughly 10–17 percent open to the idea, higher among right-leaning voters), yet the question resurfaces whenever the republic stumbles. Catholic prophecy has long spoken of a future Great Monarch, often linked to France. The most solid and officially grounded material remains the Sacred Heart revelations given to St. Margaret Mary Alacoque in 1689 and directed to Louis XIV. The messages requested the consecration of the king, the court, and France, with promises of victory and glory if obeyed. Louis XIV did not comply. Louis XVI consecrated the nation while imprisoned, but it was already too late. He was executed a century after the original request. Broader private prophecies about a future French king who restores order after chaos exist in various saints and visionaries, but they do not carry formal ecclesiastical approval. The Church has neither endorsed nor condemned the tradition as a whole.
Nevertheless, a restored monarchy with real, defined powers working alongside a representative assembly would address the structural weakness the Revolution created. The crown could hold a limited veto or delay, the power to appoint or dismiss a prime minister under clear rules, the authority to dissolve parliament in genuine deadlock, and a formal role in national crisis. These are not absolute powers. They are instruments of continuity and arbitration that an elected president, bound to a partisan mandate, cannot easily exercise without inflaming opposition. European constitutional monarchies show that a hereditary head of state can stabilize government without abolishing elections or parliaments. France’s post-1789 record of regime collapse suggests the experiment is worth considering.
Linking that monarchy to the Catholic Church would restore France’s historic identity without theocracy. The king as “eldest son of the Church” was never a clerical dictatorship. It was a recognition that the nation’s formation and moral order were Catholic. A restored monarch who publicly professes the Faith, protects the Church’s historic place in education and public life, and embodies the Social Kingship of Christ would give the country a non-partisan symbol of continuity. The Church would retain its spiritual independence. Religious freedom would remain. The arrangement would simply stop pretending that France’s identity is a blank slate created in 1789. In a society fractured by secularization and demographic change, that recognition of historical reality is not nostalgia. It is a practical step toward cohesion.
France has spent more than two centuries trying to live without the order the Revolution destroyed. The results are plain. A constitutional monarchy with real powers, publicly Catholic in the historic sense and respectful of representative government, offers one coherent way to begin repairing the damage. Whether the French people will accept it is another question. The institutional and cultural case for trying is stronger than the case for continuing the present cycle.
St. Joan of Arc, pray for us!
— ❤️🔥 —
Shane Schaetzel is an author of Catholic books and he is an Evangelical convert to the Catholic Church. His articles have been featured on LifeSiteNews, The Remnant Newspaper, Forward in Christ, and Catholic Online. You can read Shane’s books at ShaneSchaetzel.Com
